Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Ties among partner personality trait similarity, relationship onset, relationship quality, and love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 479-496. [ Links ]
Baxter, L. A., & West, L. (2003). Couple perceptions of their similarities and differences: A dialectical perspective. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 20, 491-514. [ Links ]
Berscheid, E. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and emotion. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 143-161). New York: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, E., & Walster, G. Toronto local hookup app free W. (1971). Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 173-189. [ Links ]
Berscheid, E., & Regan, P. (2005). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education (Prentice Hall). [ Links ]
Berger, C. R. (1975). Task performance and attributional communication as determinants of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 40, 280-286. [ Links ]
Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed. Pp. 193-281). New York: McGraw-Hill. [ Links ]
Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2004, May 11). Method and system for identifying people who are likely to have a successful relationship. U.S. Patent 6,735,568. Washington, DC. [ Links ]
Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2008, Nov. 18). Method and system for identifying people who are likely to have a successful relationship. U.S. Patent 7,454,357B2. Washington, DC. [ Links ]
Buss, D. M. (1984). Marital assortment for personality dispositions: Assessment with three different data sources. Behavior Genetics, 14, 111-123. [ Links ]
Byrne, D., & Rhamey, R. (1965). Magnitude of positive and negative reinforcements as a determinant of attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 884-889. [ Links ]
Carter, S. R. (2005, Feb.), For modern-day Cupids, data replaces dating: Psychological science is behind the successful matches made at eHarmony. Association for Psychological Science Observer, 18. Downloaded from [ Links ]
Carter, S. R., & Buckwalter, J. G. (2009). Enhancing mate selection through the Internet: A comparison of relationship quality between marriages arising from an online matchmaking system and marriages arising from unfettered selection. [ Links ]
Carter, S., & Snow, C. (2004, May). Helping singles enter better marriages using predictive models of marital success. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Society. [ Links ]
C). How does personality matter in ination of trait anxiety, negativity, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 326-336. [ Links ]
Clark, M. S. (1985). Implications of relationship type for understanding compatibility. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 119-140). New York: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Coombs, R. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex differences in dating aspiration and satisfaction with computer-arranged partners. Journal of ily, 28, 62-66. [ Links ]
Cooper, A., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Romance in cyberspace: Understanding online attraction. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 22, 7-14. [ Links ]
Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Do people know what they want: A similar or complementary partner? Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 595-602. [ Links ]
Feingold, A. (1988). Matching for attractiveness in romantic partners and same-sex friends: A meta-analysis and theoretical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Links ]
Felmlee, D. H. (2001). From appealing to appalling: Disenchantment with a romantic partner. Sociological Perspectives, 44, 263-280. [ Links ]
Compellingly deploy value-added infrastructures and fully researched e-markets. Globally implement market positioning catalysts for change after holistic catalysts for change. Interactively streamline team.
Dynamically Disseminate Timely Results Without Errorfree Testing Procdures. Globlycetaize Highble Competently Deliver Cross
Room No. 10, Level: 12, Sahera Tropical Center, 218 New Elephant Road, Dhaka. Bangladesh 1205
01758 711901
01625 440627
© 2024. All Rights Reserved By: Hamza Corporation. Developed By: WebCode Ltd