A safe sanctuary: an accessory principle perspective towards help trying and you will caregiving from inside the intimate relationships

shaadi visitors

A safe sanctuary: an accessory principle perspective towards help trying and you will caregiving from inside the intimate relationships

A safe sanctuary: an accessory principle perspective towards help trying and you will caregiving from inside the intimate relationships

3. Bergman, M. Age., Benzer, J. K., Henning, J. B. (2009). The latest Character from Private differences. When you look at the H. J. Klein, T. Elizabeth. Becker, J. P. Meyer (Eds.), Commitment for the teams: Gathered wisdom and the fresh guidelines (pp. 229-235). Ny: Routledge. [ Links ]

Diary away from Homosexuality, 46, 159-177

9. Diamond, L. Meters., dube, Elizabeth. Yards. (2002). Friendship and you can accessory certainly heterosexual and you can sexual-minority youths: do the newest gender of your own pal count? Record off Teens and you will Puberty, 29, 155-166. [ Links ]

ten. Elizur, Y, Mintzer, An excellent. (2003). Homosexual males? intimate relationships high quality: The fresh new spots of connection safety, gay term, societal help, and you may income. Personal Matchmaking, ten, 411-435. [ Links ]

eleven. Feeney, B. C., Collins, Letter. L. (2001). Predictors away from caregiving into the adult sexual relationship: an attachment theoretic position. Log out of Character and you may Personal Psychology, 80, 972-994. [ Links ]

12. Feeney, J. A beneficial. (1999). For the J. Cassidy and you may P. Roentgen. Razor (Eds.), Manual off Accessory: Principle, look and systematic apps (pp. 355-377). Ny: Guilford. [ Links ]

thirteen. Feeney, J. A great., Noller, P., Roberts, N. (2000). Connection and you can close relationships. During the C. Hendrick and you can S.S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close dating: A great sourcebook (pp. 185-201). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [ Links ]

fourteen. Fullilove, Meters. T. (1996). Psychological ramifications away from displacement: Efforts from the psychology out of lay. American Journal out of Psychiatry, 153, 1516-1523. [ Links ]

15. George, C. Solomon, J. (1996). Representational varieties of relationships: Website links anywhere between caregiving and you will connection. Kid Psychological state Log, 17, 198-216. [ Links ]

16. George, C., Solomon, J. (1999). Accessory and you will caregiving: The latest caregiving behavioural program. When you look at the J. Cassidy P. Roentgen. Shaver (Eds.). Handbook regarding Attachment: Theory, browse and you will scientific software (pp. 649-670). Ny: Guilford. [ Links ]

17. Giuliani, M. V., feldman, R. (1993). Lay connection in a good developmental and you will social perspective. Record off Ecological Therapy, thirteen, 267-274. [ Links ]

18. Gustafson, P. (2001). Origins and pathways: Exploring the relationships anywhere between lay accessory and you may flexibility. Ecosystem and you may Conclusion, 5, 667-686. [ Links ]

19. Guzzo, R. An excellent., Shea, Grams. P. (1992). Group overall performance and you can social group dating in communities. From inside the Yards. d. dunnette L. Yards. Hough (Eds). Guide regarding Industrial and you will Business Psychology, Vol 3. (pp. 269-313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Force. [ Links ]

20. Harris, P. https://datingranking.net/pl/shaadi-recenzja/ B., Brownish, B. B., Werner, C. M. (1996). Confidentiality statutes and set accessory: Anticipating accessory to a student loved ones housing studio. Journal out-of Environmental Therapy, 16, 287-301. [ Links ]

21. Haslem, An effective. S., Reicher, S. (2006). Stressing the team: Public identity therefore the folding fictional character out of solutions in order to fret. Log out-of Applied Psychology, 91, 1037-1052. [ Links ]

twenty two. Hidalgo, M. C., Hernandez, B. (2001). Put attachment: Conceptual and you can empirical concerns. Log regarding Ecological Mindset, 21, 273-281. [ Links ]

23. Ilies, Roentgen., Wagner, D. T., Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Outlining affective linkages in communities. Record from Used Therapy, ninety-five, 1140-1148. [ Links ]

twenty-four. Jellison, W. A beneficial., McConnell, An effective. R. (2003). This new mediating negative effects of thinking to the homosexuality anywhere between safer connection and you will disclosure consequences certainly gay boys. [ Links ]

25. Kirpatrick, L. Good. (1998). Progression, pair-bonding, and you may reproductive methods: An effective reconceptualization from adult connection. During the J. A good. Simpson and W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment idea and you can close dating (pp. 353-393). Ny: Guilford. [ Links ]

twenty seven. Kunce, L. J. Razor, P. R. (1994). A connection theoretical way of caregiving inside close matchmaking. Improves in the Private Relationship, 5, 205-237. [ Links ]

twenty-eight. Kurdek, L. An excellent. (2005). What do we realize on the gay and lesbian people? Most recent Guidelines when you look at the Emotional Sciences, 14, 251-254. [ Links ]

Adult intimate accessory and you will few relationships

29. LePine, J. A., Erez, A great., Johnson, d. Elizabeth. (2002). The sort and dimensionality out of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical comment and meta-analysis. Journal regarding Applied Therapy, 87, 52-65. [ Links ]

Compellingly deploy value-added infrastructures and fully researched e-markets. Globally implement market positioning catalysts for change after holistic catalysts for change. Interactively streamline team.

hamza/administrator

Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

READY TO GET STARTED?

Dynamically Disseminate Timely Results Without Errorfree Testing Procdures. Globlycetaize Highble Competently Deliver Cross